लघुसिद्धान्तकौमुदी · वरदराज

back to the poem
← प्रकरण 5

6.1.104

नादिचि

लघुसिद्धान्तकौमुदी 126 · प्रकरण 5, which opens at अर्थवदधातुरप्रत्ययः प्रातिपदिकम् · rule 12 of 100 in it

no single-long substitute when the case ending begins with a vowel other than अ

न आदिचि — "not when the beginning is an इच्". The single homorganic long vowel that 6.1.102 प्रथमयोः पूर्वसवर्णः puts in for a stem-vowel plus a nominative or accusative ending does not apply when that ending begins with an इच् — any vowel other than अ (the इच् set: इ उ ऋ ऌ ए ओ ऐ औ). So before the dual ending औ there is no merger: प्रत्यासन्न + औ stays प्रत्यासन्नौ "the two brought near", the vowels joining by वृद्धि rather than by the single long.

  • Aṣṭādhyāyī — 6.1.104 नादिचि
  • Bālānandinī (LSK, Telugu) — सूत्र 126 in the abridgement; vendor/balanandini-lsk-telugu-ocr.txt

uncheckeddrafted from the rule text and the Bālānandinī

वरदराज writes under it

आदिचि न पूर्वसवर्णदीर्घः। वृद्धिरेचि। रामौ॥

uncheckedashtadhyayi.com (prakriyā)

1 derivation stand on it

1 words of this poem

the derivation names it — The rule stands at a step of the chain that produces the ending.