लघुसिद्धान्तकौमुदी · वरदराज

back to the poem
← प्रकरण 12

6.4.74

न माङ्योगे

लघुसिद्धान्तकौमुदी 439 · प्रकरण 12, which opens at लः कर्मणि च भावे चाकर्मकेभ्यः · rule 69 of 179 in it

in construction with माङ्, the augments अट् and आट् do not appear

When a root stands in construction with माङ् — the prohibitive particle मा, "do not" — the augments अट् and आट् (the अ- that the past tenses prefix to the root) do not appear. The prohibition is put in a past-tense form but without the past marker, so मा भूः "do not be" keeps भू bare where an ordinary aorist would prefix the augment and read अभूः. The derivation names this rule on the silent step where the augment is held back. The rule is a बहिरङ्ग exception the abridgement gives for the माङ् construction; the corpus reaches it in the poem's prohibitions.

  • Aṣṭādhyāyī — 6.4.74 न माङ्योगे
  • Bālānandinī (LSK, Telugu) — सूत्र 439 in the abridgement; vendor/balanandini-lsk-telugu-ocr.txt

uncheckeddrafted from the rule text and the Bālānandinī

वरदराज writes under it

अडाटौ न स्तः। मा भवान् भूत्। मा स्म भवत्। मा स्म भूत्॥

uncheckedashtadhyayi.com (prakriyā)

3 derivations stand on it

5 words of this poem

the derivation names it — The rule stands at a step of the chain that produces the ending.