*Cloud — having done me this kindness, out of friendship, or else thinking* he is torn apart *and pitying me, who keep pressing a request I have no business making — range over whatever regions you please, with the rains having filled your beauty out. And may you never, not for a moment, be parted like this from your lightning.*
**The poem ends on the word it is about.** विप्रयोगः, separation, glossed विरहः and standing under a मा. And Mallinātha supplies the one word that turns the blessing from weather into a marriage: **कलत्रेणेति शेषः**, *your wife* is to be supplied for the lightning. Nothing on the page says that. A cloud and its lightning are never apart, and the man wishing it on the cloud has been apart from his for eight months. **It is the last thing this commentary writes into this poem**, and it is a word for a spouse.
**And the blessing has a handbook behind it.** Mallinātha closes by quoting the *Sārasvatālaṅkāra* — अन्ते काव्यस्य नित्यत्वात्कुर्यादाशिषमुत्तमाम् … नायकेच्छानुरूपिणीम्, *because it is required at a poem's end, one should make an excellent benediction, one shaped to the hero's wish* — and concludes काव्यान्ते नायकेच्छानुरूपोऽयमाशीर्वादः प्रयुक्त इत्यनुसन्धेयम्, *this blessing at the poem's close, shaped to the hero's wish, is to be understood as so employed.* **So the last line is where it is because a manual of poetics says a poem must end that way.** That is the seventh non-poetic book to produce a reading in this canto, after the Sāmudrika, the Ratirahasya, the Nimittanidāna, the Ratisarvasva, the Rasaratnākara and the Śabdārṇava, and the first that is about how to end a poem rather than about what is in one.
**एवम् is one syllable and his gloss on it is one word**: मद्वत्, *as with me*. Without it the particle is merely *thus*. With it the poem's last sentence is a man wishing on somebody else the exact absence of the thing he does not have.
**The apology is about the asking.** अनुचितप्रार्थनावर्तिनः — of me who persist in an unbecoming request — and Mallinātha glosses अनुचिता as **तवाननुरूपा**, not befitting *you*: the impropriety was ever to have asked a cloud. Then he writes the request out in words the poem never contains — “सन्देशं मे हर”, *carry my message* — so that a hundred and twenty stanzas of asking finally has a sentence.
**Two citations in one comment and the check separates them.** “हृद्भगसिन्ध्वन्ते पूर्वपदस्य च”, for why सुहृद् gives सौहार्द with both members raised, **is** Pāṇini 7.3.19 and is in skt-data's sūtra corpus. “देशकालाध्वगन्तव्याः कर्मसंज्ञा ह्यकर्मणाम्”, for how an intransitive verb of motion takes देशान् in the second case, is **not**, and he calls it a वचन rather than a sūtra. Sixth time the test has told them apart, and the first time it has done so twice inside one stanza.
**DCS's last error is its most internal.** मा भूत् stands at 2.37 and here, the same two words, and it is tagged `l=lun_unaug` there and `l=vidhilin` — the optative — here. Mallinātha names the rule that settles it: माङीत्याशिषि लुङ्, Pāṇini 3.3.175, the aorist after माङ्.
**Three words of the last stanza carry no paradigm and all three are consonant stems**: प्रावृषा, where skt-data offers no class for a stem in ष्; विद्युता, where it offers none for a feminine root-noun in त्; and संभृतश्रीः, where the ī-stem exists and the masculine of it does not. **The poem's last line is where the generator runs out.**
**And the commentary agrees with this corpus about where the poem stops.** After the gloss comes the colophon — इति … मेघदूते काव्ये उत्तरमेघः समाप्तः — and then one more sentence: **अन्त इमे क्षेपका दृश्यन्ते**, *at the end these interpolations are seen.* `text.md` prints five more stanzas after this one, each marked `॥ ? ॥`, and `tools/build_corpus.py` drops them. The question left open at 2.32 — whether the doubtful stanzas should be reachable at all — has Mallinātha's own word on it: he calls them क्षेपक and stops. No figure is named.
uncheckedthe reader's reading, following Mallinātha, Sañjīvinī's gloss. His are: हे जलद, सौहार्दात्सुहृद्भावात् with the 7.3.19 citation, विधुरो वियुक्त इति हेतोर्वा with the Amara line, मयि विषयेऽनुक्रोशबुद्ध्या करुणाबुद्ध्या, the unpacking of अनुचितप्रार्थनावर्तिनः with “सन्देशं मे हर”, एतत्सन्देशहरणरूपं प्रियं कृत्वा सम्पाद्य, प्रावृषा वर्षाभिः with Amara, संभृतश्रीरुपचितशोभः सन्, इष्टान्स्वाभिलषितान्देशान्विचर with यथेष्टदेशेषु विहर and the कर्मत्व citation, एवं मद्वत्, क्षणमपि स्वल्पकालमपि, ते तव विद्युता with कलत्रेणेति शेषः, विप्रयोगो विरहो मा भून्मास्तु with माङीत्याशिषि लुङ्, the Sārasvatālaṅkāra quotation and its conclusion, the colophon, and अन्त इमे क्षेपका दृश्यन्ते. That the quoted request is not in the poem, that प्रिय and संभृत and उपचित and इष्ट come back from earlier stanzas, and that the five stanzas `text.md` prints after this one are the ones he calls क्षेपक are the reader's, checked against `text.md`. Pāṇini 3.3.175, 7.3.19, 1.4.49, 2.3.2, 6.4.74, 6.1.77 and 6.1.113 are by way of skt-data's sūtra corpus, of which he names 3.3.175 and 7.3.19. Amara's text and the Sārasvatālaṅkāra are not in this repository and neither can be checked“te tava vidyutā | kalatreṇeti śeṣaḥ | viprayogo viraho mā bhūn māstu || māṅ ity āśiṣi luṅ … kāvyānte nāyakecchānurūpo 'yam āśīrvādaḥ prayukta ityanusandheyam”
Cloud — having done me this kindness, out of friendship, or else thinking he is torn apart and pitying me, who keep pressing a request I have no business making — range over whatever regions you please, with the rains having filled your beauty out. And may you never, not for a moment, be parted like this from your lightning. — This is the poem's closing benediction, and it has a handbook behind it. Mallinātha ends by quoting the Sārasvatālaṅkāra, a manual of poetics — अन्ते काव्यस्य नित्यत्वात्कुर्यादाशिषमुत्तमाम् … नायकेच्छानुरूपिणीम्, *because it is required at a poem's end, one should make an excellent benediction, one shaped to the hero's wish* — and concludes that this blessing is so employed. So the last line is where it is because a manual of poetics says a poem must end that way, with an āśīs, a blessing, cut to the hero's own desire. No rhetorical figure is named.
- Mallinātha, Sañjīvinī — 2.55: kāvyānte nāyakecchānurūpo 'yam āśīrvādaḥ prayukta ityanusandheyam