Where at sunrise the night's road of the women is pointed out by mandāra flowers dropped from their curls by the tremor of walking, by cut leaf-patterns, by golden lotuses slipping from their ears, by pearl nets, and by necklaces whose thread snapped at the breast. **Five things on the ground and one verb, and the verb is not 'lie' but 'show'.** The stanza is a piece of reading: someone comes out at dawn and works out from the litter where a woman went. Mallinātha names her — कामिनीनाम् अभिसारिकाणाम्, the woman of the manuals who goes out at night to her lover rather than waiting for him — and then says in so many words that the stanza is an inference: मार्गपतितमन्दारकुसुमादिलिङ्गैरयमभिसारिकाणां पन्था इत्यनुमीयते, 'by the marks — mandāra flowers fallen on the road and the rest — it is inferred that this is the path of the women who went out'. **लिङ्ग is the logician's word** for the thing you see that lets you conclude the thing you cannot, and अनुमीयते is the verb of formal inference. The poem gave him the same opening once before: at 1.21 the verb was सूचयिष्यन्ति and he glossed it अनुमापयिष्यन्ति. Both times the root is √सूच् and both times he reaches for अनुमान. **He also states, for the first time in seventy-six stanzas, how he chooses a paraphrase.** कनककमल could be unpacked with the genitive, कनकस्य कमलानि, or with the affix मयट्, कनकमयानि कमलानि; he takes the genitive and gives the reason — षष्ठ्या विवक्षितार्थलाभे सति मयटा विग्रहेऽध्याहारदोषः, unpacking with मयट् when the genitive already gives the sense is the fault of supplying what is not there — and closes एवमन्यत्राप्यनुसन्धेयम्, so it is to be understood elsewhere too. Take the paraphrase that adds least. He names no figure.
uncheckedthe reader's reading, following Mallinātha's gloss; the identification of the women as abhisārikās, the reading of the stanza as an inference from liṅgas, the rule about मयट् and the vigraha, the derivation of नैश from निशा and the identification of पत्रच्छेद as the cut leaf-pattern worn on the body are his“kāminīnām abhisārikāṇām … ṣaṣṭhyā vivakṣitārthalābhe sati mayaṭā vigrahe ’dhyāhāradoṣaḥ | evam anyatrāpy anusandheyam … mārgapatitamandārakusumādiliṅgair ayam abhisārikāṇāṃ panthā ityanumīyata ityarthaḥ”
Where at sunrise the night's road of the women is pointed out by mandāra flowers dropped from their curls by the tremor of walking, by cut leaf-patterns, by golden lotuses slipping from their ears, by pearl nets, and by necklaces whose thread snapped at the breast. Five things on the ground and one verb, 'show': the stanza is an inference, and the woman it infers is the abhisārikā, who goes out to her lover under cover of dark. What gives her away is not that she was seen but that she shed, all along the road, the flowers and the jewellery a night of walking and love shakes loose; dawn reads the trail she could not help leaving.
- Mallinātha, Sañjīvinī — 2.11, whole-verse gloss