Where the trees are always in flower and loud with drunken bees; where the lotus ponds always have their lotuses and wear a girdle woven of lines of geese; where the house peacocks always have their tails shining and crane their necks crying; where the early nights are always moonlit, the dark beaten back and lovely with it. **The stanza is four sentences of the same shape and the shape is a denial.** नित्य stands once in each pāda, and under each of the four Mallinātha writes what it rules out: न तु ऋतुनियमात्, not by the rule of a season; न तु हेमन्तवर्जितम्, not with winter left out; न तु वर्षास्वेव, not only in the rains; न तु शुक्लपक्ष एव, not only in the bright fortnight. Four things that everywhere else come and go — blossom, lotus, a peacock's tail, the moon — and each of them is here taken off its schedule. Then he does the second thing four times: अत एव, 'and just for that reason', linking each perpetual thing to what follows from it. Bees stay where the flowers are; geese stay where the lotuses are; a peacock in his tail cries; a night with a moon in it is lovely. So the stanza's second half of each line is not a further wonder but a consequence, and his prose order puts the cause first where the verse puts it second. **This is also the verse of the poem that no tagged stanza reconstructs**, and both places it parts from the tagged corpus are places where the commentary decides it: भवनशिखिनः against भुवनशिखिनः, where his क्रीडामयूराः means birds somebody keeps in a house, and प्रतिहततमोवृत्ति against प्रहिततमोवृत्ति, where his प्रतिहता तमसां वृत्तिः means the dark is driven off rather than sent out. The morphology of those two words is authored and says so. He names no figure. He also supplies no verb here, having said at 2.2 that an 'is' is to be understood throughout. **And he does not count this stanza.** He prints it without a number, prints 2.4 without one too, and at the end of his comment on that verse writes श्लोकद्वयं प्रक्षिप्तम्, 'the two stanzas are interpolated'; his numbering resumes with ॥ ३ ॥ at the verse this text calls 2.5. He comments on both in full first, which is what makes the judgement worth having — it is not a refusal to read them.
uncheckedthe reader's reading, following Mallinātha's gloss; the four denials, the four अत एव links, the readings of भवन and प्रतिहत, and the judgement श्लोकद्वयं प्रक्षिप्तम् at the close of the next stanza are his. The two words the tagged corpus reads differently are authored and name no tagged corpus as their source“na tvṛtuniyamāditi bhāvaḥ … na tu hemantavarjitamityarthaḥ … na tu varṣāsveva … na tu śuklapakṣa eva”
Where the trees are always in flower and loud with drunken bees; where the lotus ponds always have their lotuses and wear a girdle woven of lines of geese; where the house peacocks always have their tails shining and crane their necks crying; where the early nights are always moonlit, the dark beaten back and lovely with it. Four perpetual things, and after each its consequence. Mallinātha prints this stanza without a number and 2.4 without one too, and at the end of his comment on 2.4 writes श्लोकद्वयं प्रक्षिप्तम्, 'the two stanzas are interpolated' — his own numbering resumes with ॥ ३ ॥ at the verse this text calls 2.5. He comments on both in full first, which is what makes the judgement worth having: it is a reading, not a refusal to read.
- Mallinātha, Sañjīvinī — 2.3–2.4: ślokadvayaṃ prakṣiptam